<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 183 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765637</link>
    <description>In a PMLA prosecution, prolonged pre-trial incarceration, completion of investigation, and the absence of any realistic prospect of the predicate offence trial ending within a reasonable time were treated as overriding the Section 45 bail embargo. The Court held that personal liberty and the right to a speedy trial could prevail where the accused had cooperated with investigation and remained in custody for over a year. The arrest record and contemporaneous grounds of arrest did not disclose any separate infirmity that would independently defeat bail. Bail was therefore granted subject to conditions, with continued detention found unjustified on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 183 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765637</link>
      <description>In a PMLA prosecution, prolonged pre-trial incarceration, completion of investigation, and the absence of any realistic prospect of the predicate offence trial ending within a reasonable time were treated as overriding the Section 45 bail embargo. The Court held that personal liberty and the right to a speedy trial could prevail where the accused had cooperated with investigation and remained in custody for over a year. The arrest record and contemporaneous grounds of arrest did not disclose any separate infirmity that would independently defeat bail. Bail was therefore granted subject to conditions, with continued detention found unjustified on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>