<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 204 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765658</link>
    <description>The Madras HC set aside an assessment order where the authority proceeded on the mistaken basis that no reply had been filed and no hearing attended, despite the petitioner having submitted objections to the show cause notice. The Court found the denial of a proper opportunity of hearing unsustainable and directed reconsideration after allowing the petitioner to place additional objections. It also directed that the bank attachment be lifted forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 204 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765658</link>
      <description>The Madras HC set aside an assessment order where the authority proceeded on the mistaken basis that no reply had been filed and no hearing attended, despite the petitioner having submitted objections to the show cause notice. The Court found the denial of a proper opportunity of hearing unsustainable and directed reconsideration after allowing the petitioner to place additional objections. It also directed that the bank attachment be lifted forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>