<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 195 for License Fees to Non-Resident Entity Requires Fresh Examination</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85489</link>
    <description>ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding TDS obligations under s.195 for license fees paid to non-resident associated enterprise. The appellate authority failed to address crucial aspects: taxability of license fees under India-USA DTAA Article 12, and applicability of s.195 TDS requirements. CIT(A)&#039;s decision was influenced by assessee&#039;s subsequent year tax compliance but lacked proper reasoning under s.250(6). Following established principle that statutory procedures must be strictly followed, ITAT found CIT(A)&#039;s adjudication procedurally deficient. Both Revenue&#039;s appeal and assessee&#039;s cross-objection allowed for statistical purposes, with matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 195 for License Fees to Non-Resident Entity Requires Fresh Examination</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85489</link>
      <description>ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding TDS obligations under s.195 for license fees paid to non-resident associated enterprise. The appellate authority failed to address crucial aspects: taxability of license fees under India-USA DTAA Article 12, and applicability of s.195 TDS requirements. CIT(A)&#039;s decision was influenced by assessee&#039;s subsequent year tax compliance but lacked proper reasoning under s.250(6). Following established principle that statutory procedures must be strictly followed, ITAT found CIT(A)&#039;s adjudication procedurally deficient. Both Revenue&#039;s appeal and assessee&#039;s cross-objection allowed for statistical purposes, with matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>