<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765593</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of a 100% EOU regarding customs duty recovery on raw materials used for manufacturing goods cleared in DTA at nil duty rate. The tribunal held that exemption notifications N/N. 12/2012-Cus (S No 431) and 12/2012-CE (S No 272) should be interpreted liberally, covering all items used directly or indirectly in manufacturing mobile handsets and accessories. Citing SC precedent in Jawahar Mills, the tribunal emphasized that the phrase &quot;for the manufacture of&quot; encompasses all goods consumed in the production process, not just identifiable components. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765593</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of a 100% EOU regarding customs duty recovery on raw materials used for manufacturing goods cleared in DTA at nil duty rate. The tribunal held that exemption notifications N/N. 12/2012-Cus (S No 431) and 12/2012-CE (S No 272) should be interpreted liberally, covering all items used directly or indirectly in manufacturing mobile handsets and accessories. Citing SC precedent in Jawahar Mills, the tribunal emphasized that the phrase &quot;for the manufacture of&quot; encompasses all goods consumed in the production process, not just identifiable components. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>