<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765596</link>
    <description>The CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal regarding appropriation of pre-deposited amounts. The appellant had deposited Rs. 61,06,692 during investigation under &quot;other receipts&quot; anticipating penalty liability. After the order was passed, this amount was adjusted against the required 25% penalty deposit to avail reduced penalty benefits. The tribunal held that the same amount cannot be simultaneously adjusted towards both duty and penalty obligations. Since the pre-deposited amount was already utilized for penalty purposes, it could not be redirected towards duty payment, as this would result in insufficient penalty payment below the required 25% threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765596</link>
      <description>The CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the appeal regarding appropriation of pre-deposited amounts. The appellant had deposited Rs. 61,06,692 during investigation under &quot;other receipts&quot; anticipating penalty liability. After the order was passed, this amount was adjusted against the required 25% penalty deposit to avail reduced penalty benefits. The tribunal held that the same amount cannot be simultaneously adjusted towards both duty and penalty obligations. Since the pre-deposited amount was already utilized for penalty purposes, it could not be redirected towards duty payment, as this would result in insufficient penalty payment below the required 25% threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>