https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765599 NCLAT dismissed appeals seeking compensation under Section 42A of Competition Act, 2002. Appellants claimed Rs. 42,42,000 each for delayed flat possession and cost increases by dominant real estate developer. Tribunal held compensation only payable for violation of CCI orders, not mere anti-competitive conduct findings. Appellants' consent to cost enhancement precluded challenge. Despite CCI finding abuse of dominant position, no CCI order violation occurred, making compensation claims unmeritorious. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765599 NCLAT dismissed appeals seeking compensation under Section 42A of Competition Act, 2002. Appellants claimed Rs. 42,42,000 each for delayed flat possession and cost increases by dominant real estate developer. Tribunal held compensation only payable for violation of CCI orders, not mere anti-competitive conduct findings. Appellants' consent to cost enhancement precluded challenge. Despite CCI finding abuse of dominant position, no CCI order violation occurred, making compensation claims unmeritorious. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765599