<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 162 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765616</link>
    <description>Rejection of a statutory registration application on a technical ground not put to the applicant was held to violate natural justice. The applicant had furnished the called-for documents, but was not given notice that ineligibility under the specific clause was the proposed basis of refusal. As no effective opportunity was afforded to meet that ground, the rejection could not be sustained and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication after a proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 162 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765616</link>
      <description>Rejection of a statutory registration application on a technical ground not put to the applicant was held to violate natural justice. The applicant had furnished the called-for documents, but was not given notice that ineligibility under the specific clause was the proposed basis of refusal. As no effective opportunity was afforded to meet that ground, the rejection could not be sustained and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication after a proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>