<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765618</link>
    <description>ITAT held that payments made through cheques toward property purchase, supported by solemnized affidavit, cannot be treated as unexplained investment. The tribunal found both sources of property investment sufficiently explained and deleted the addition upheld by CIT(A). The decision favored the assessee, ruling that documented cheque payments with proper affidavit constitute adequate explanation for property investment sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765618</link>
      <description>ITAT held that payments made through cheques toward property purchase, supported by solemnized affidavit, cannot be treated as unexplained investment. The tribunal found both sources of property investment sufficiently explained and deleted the addition upheld by CIT(A). The decision favored the assessee, ruling that documented cheque payments with proper affidavit constitute adequate explanation for property investment sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>