<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 165 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765619</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of assessee regarding deduction under section 80P(2)(d). Revenue denied deduction and rejected rectification petition under section 154. CIT(A) dismissed appeal claiming orders under section 154 are not appealable. ITAT held that section 246A(c) clearly permits appeals against section 154 orders. Court set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleted the addition, and allowed assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing statutory provisions and judicial precedents support appealability of rectification orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 165 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765619</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of assessee regarding deduction under section 80P(2)(d). Revenue denied deduction and rejected rectification petition under section 154. CIT(A) dismissed appeal claiming orders under section 154 are not appealable. ITAT held that section 246A(c) clearly permits appeals against section 154 orders. Court set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleted the addition, and allowed assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing statutory provisions and judicial precedents support appealability of rectification orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>