<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41006</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the cancellation of the private warehouse license, determining it was justified due to the availability of a public bonded warehouse. The Court emphasized that the Customs Act provisions allowed for license cancellation without a hearing in specific circumstances, where no breach inquiry was necessary. It rejected the challenge to the constitutionality of the relevant clause, finding no arbitrariness in the decision. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41006</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the cancellation of the private warehouse license, determining it was justified due to the availability of a public bonded warehouse. The Court emphasized that the Customs Act provisions allowed for license cancellation without a hearing in specific circumstances, where no breach inquiry was necessary. It rejected the challenge to the constitutionality of the relevant clause, finding no arbitrariness in the decision. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>