https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460595 An expired way leave permission could not be revived or treated as a renewal after a long lapse where the petitioner had later obtained valid permissions and agreements creating conflicting rights over an underpass. The attempt to characterise the work as a repair of an underground pipeline was inconsistent with the materials showing overhead construction on railway land, which was barred by the Railway Engineering Code and the Railway Land Management policy framework. The Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code could not create new public law rights or displace the petitioner's existing rights. The impugned railway communications and consequential steps were therefore stated to be illegal and void. en-us Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2025 19:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460595 An expired way leave permission could not be revived or treated as a renewal after a long lapse where the petitioner had later obtained valid permissions and agreements creating conflicting rights over an underpass. The attempt to characterise the work as a repair of an underground pipeline was inconsistent with the materials showing overhead construction on railway land, which was barred by the Railway Engineering Code and the Railway Land Management policy framework. The Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code could not create new public law rights or displace the petitioner's existing rights. The impugned railway communications and consequential steps were therefore stated to be illegal and void. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460595