https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460597 Bail was granted in a prosecution concerning alleged supply and distribution of spurious anti-cancer medicines because the petitioner had remained in custody since 13.03.2024, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the principal material against the petitioner was documentary and already in police custody. On that basis, the Court found the risk of tampering with evidence to be remote. It also treated the apprehension of witness influence as minimal because most witnesses were official witnesses. Applying settled bail parameters, the Court held that continued custodial detention was not warranted and released the petitioner on conditions. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2025 19:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460597 Bail was granted in a prosecution concerning alleged supply and distribution of spurious anti-cancer medicines because the petitioner had remained in custody since 13.03.2024, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the principal material against the petitioner was documentary and already in police custody. On that basis, the Court found the risk of tampering with evidence to be remote. It also treated the apprehension of witness influence as minimal because most witnesses were official witnesses. Applying settled bail parameters, the Court held that continued custodial detention was not warranted and released the petitioner on conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460597