<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41002</link>
    <description>Purchasers who market typewriter ribbons manufactured by another concern under their own brand name are not manufacturers under Section 2(f) where manufacture is complete at the producer&#039;s factory and they neither supply materials or labour nor exercise technical control over production. Embossing a brand name on containers and price tags does not itself create manufacturer status. Treating such a purchaser as comparable to a loan licensee is unsupported where the actual producer accounts for the goods as its excisable clearances and complies separately with tax obligations. The excise-duty confirmation against the purchaser was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41002</link>
      <description>Purchasers who market typewriter ribbons manufactured by another concern under their own brand name are not manufacturers under Section 2(f) where manufacture is complete at the producer&#039;s factory and they neither supply materials or labour nor exercise technical control over production. Embossing a brand name on containers and price tags does not itself create manufacturer status. Treating such a purchaser as comparable to a loan licensee is unsupported where the actual producer accounts for the goods as its excisable clearances and complies separately with tax obligations. The excise-duty confirmation against the purchaser was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>