https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32844 The complaint alleges the agriculture department bypassed the Direct Benefit Transfer regime by procuring inputs for distribution, citing a 2018 DBT government resolution and a March 12, 2024 order appointing a controlling officer for purchases. It claims objections by the agriculture commissioner were ignored, that removals from the DBT list and tender permissions occurred without required committee approval, and that procurement of nano urea, nano DAP, battery sprayers, metaldehyde pesticide and cotton bags involved alleged inflated pricing compared with market rates. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:46:02 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32844 The complaint alleges the agriculture department bypassed the Direct Benefit Transfer regime by procuring inputs for distribution, citing a 2018 DBT government resolution and a March 12, 2024 order appointing a controlling officer for purchases. It claims objections by the agriculture commissioner were ignored, that removals from the DBT list and tender permissions occurred without required committee approval, and that procurement of nano urea, nano DAP, battery sprayers, metaldehyde pesticide and cotton bags involved alleged inflated pricing compared with market rates. News - Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:46:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32844