<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Demand Stayed: Interim Relief Granted with 10% Payment Condition Under Section 107(6) for Non-Operational Tribunal Case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85475</link>
    <description>HC granted interim stay on tax demand following appeal disposal, acknowledging non-operational status of Appellate Tribunal. Initial two-week unconditional stay granted, with extension contingent on petitioner&#039;s payment of 10% of disputed tax balance, supplementing previous Section 107(6) deposits. Stay continuation linked to either writ petition resolution or subsequent orders. Court directed filing of affidavit-in-opposition within six weeks, allowing one week for reply. Decision balanced taxpayer protection with revenue interests while addressing procedural gap due to pending Tribunal establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Demand Stayed: Interim Relief Granted with 10% Payment Condition Under Section 107(6) for Non-Operational Tribunal Case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85475</link>
      <description>HC granted interim stay on tax demand following appeal disposal, acknowledging non-operational status of Appellate Tribunal. Initial two-week unconditional stay granted, with extension contingent on petitioner&#039;s payment of 10% of disputed tax balance, supplementing previous Section 107(6) deposits. Stay continuation linked to either writ petition resolution or subsequent orders. Court directed filing of affidavit-in-opposition within six weeks, allowing one week for reply. Decision balanced taxpayer protection with revenue interests while addressing procedural gap due to pending Tribunal establishment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>