<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 102 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765556</link>
    <description>For the pre-01.04.2011 regime, input service covered services used directly or indirectly in relation to output service and services with a business nexus. On that basis, Cenvat credit on insurance premium paid for employees and their family members was admissible because the expenditure was linked to employee welfare and business functioning. Cenvat credit on mandap keeper services for annual day celebrations was also admissible because the celebrations were treated as connected with business environment and employee engagement. The denial of credit, interest and penalties could not be sustained, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 102 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765556</link>
      <description>For the pre-01.04.2011 regime, input service covered services used directly or indirectly in relation to output service and services with a business nexus. On that basis, Cenvat credit on insurance premium paid for employees and their family members was admissible because the expenditure was linked to employee welfare and business functioning. Cenvat credit on mandap keeper services for annual day celebrations was also admissible because the celebrations were treated as connected with business environment and employee engagement. The denial of credit, interest and penalties could not be sustained, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>