<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 106 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765560</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the review petition, finding no error apparent on the record. The Court affirmed prior conclusions regarding the extended period of limitation and held there was no suppression of material facts warranting review. It upheld the levy of service tax on health and fitness services where activities included providing education to patients about yoga, while also addressing taxation of donations received for yoga camps and residential yoga camps under the existing legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 106 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765560</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the review petition, finding no error apparent on the record. The Court affirmed prior conclusions regarding the extended period of limitation and held there was no suppression of material facts warranting review. It upheld the levy of service tax on health and fitness services where activities included providing education to patients about yoga, while also addressing taxation of donations received for yoga camps and residential yoga camps under the existing legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>