<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 113 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765567</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that customs duty refund appeals were not time-barred despite delay. The court ruled that refund applications filed in 2015 for 2014 bills of entry could not be rejected on limitation grounds after SC&#039;s decision in ITC Limited changed the legal framework requiring assessment modification before refund. The delay was condonable as the fundamental basis for refund changed post-ITC judgment, and appeals were filed within 90 days of that decision. Appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 113 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765567</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that customs duty refund appeals were not time-barred despite delay. The court ruled that refund applications filed in 2015 for 2014 bills of entry could not be rejected on limitation grounds after SC&#039;s decision in ITC Limited changed the legal framework requiring assessment modification before refund. The delay was condonable as the fundamental basis for refund changed post-ITC judgment, and appeals were filed within 90 days of that decision. Appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>