<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 126 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765580</link>
    <description>A belated refund claim filed after the time prescribed under Section 139(5) and beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year could not support a direction for interest under the governing administrative instruction, which excluded interest on delayed claims. The refund claim itself remained to be considered in accordance with law, but the direction to consider or grant applicable interest was unsustainable on those facts and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 126 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765580</link>
      <description>A belated refund claim filed after the time prescribed under Section 139(5) and beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year could not support a direction for interest under the governing administrative instruction, which excluded interest on delayed claims. The refund claim itself remained to be considered in accordance with law, but the direction to consider or grant applicable interest was unsustainable on those facts and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>