<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765584</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that GST registration cancellation was unjustified due to petitioner&#039;s health issues. The court ordered registration restoration, mandating filing of overdue returns within four weeks, paying applicable taxes and fees. Specific conditions were imposed, including scrutiny of Input Tax Credit and compliance requirements. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and consideration of individual circumstances in administrative tax decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765584</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that GST registration cancellation was unjustified due to petitioner&#039;s health issues. The court ordered registration restoration, mandating filing of overdue returns within four weeks, paying applicable taxes and fees. Specific conditions were imposed, including scrutiny of Input Tax Credit and compliance requirements. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and consideration of individual circumstances in administrative tax decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>