<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 131 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765585</link>
    <description>The challenge to section 174(2) of the GST Act, 2017 was treated as already covered by the High Court&#039;s earlier decision, which made the challenge subject to the final outcome in T.S. Belaraman v. Commercial Tax Officer. The same observations and order were applied mutatis mutandis to the present petition, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 131 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765585</link>
      <description>The challenge to section 174(2) of the GST Act, 2017 was treated as already covered by the High Court&#039;s earlier decision, which made the challenge subject to the final outcome in T.S. Belaraman v. Commercial Tax Officer. The same observations and order were applied mutatis mutandis to the present petition, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>