<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1477 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460580</link>
    <description>The SC corrected a procedural error, determining that the respondents, not the appellants, are entitled to file fresh petitions before the respective HCs by August 15, 2017. The Court extended the interim orders to maintain the status quo during this period, ensuring procedural fairness and continuity in the legal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of procedural accuracy and the equitable extension of interim orders to prevent adverse consequences due to delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 18:58:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=795112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1477 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460580</link>
      <description>The SC corrected a procedural error, determining that the respondents, not the appellants, are entitled to file fresh petitions before the respective HCs by August 15, 2017. The Court extended the interim orders to maintain the status quo during this period, ensuring procedural fairness and continuity in the legal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of procedural accuracy and the equitable extension of interim orders to prevent adverse consequences due to delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>