<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40965</link>
    <description>Excise valuation under Section 4 required the assessable value to be the wholesale cash price in an arm&#039;s length sale in the ordinary course of business. Sales to industrial consumers were not treated as the relevant wholesale market, and on the facts the distributor transactions were found not to be at arm&#039;s length because of common management links. The alleged overpayment was therefore not shown to arise from a mistake of law; at most, there was a possible misapplication of the settled principle to the facts. A refund was accordingly not available, particularly since the original assessment was not appealed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 15:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40965</link>
      <description>Excise valuation under Section 4 required the assessable value to be the wholesale cash price in an arm&#039;s length sale in the ordinary course of business. Sales to industrial consumers were not treated as the relevant wholesale market, and on the facts the distributor transactions were found not to be at arm&#039;s length because of common management links. The alleged overpayment was therefore not shown to arise from a mistake of law; at most, there was a possible misapplication of the settled principle to the facts. A refund was accordingly not available, particularly since the original assessment was not appealed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>