<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalties Waived For Cash Loans Under Section 269SS Due To Genuine Financial Crisis And Lender&#039;s Anonymity Concerns</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85429</link>
    <description>ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee&#039;s circumstances as middle-class, uneducated individual who received loans from agriculturists seeking anonymity due to CBI concerns. Reasonable cause was established given the timing of loans immediately after CBI actions and assessee&#039;s dire financial need. The subsequent cash repayment was made on lender&#039;s insistence. Given these mitigating factors and genuine circumstances, ITAT determined penalties were not warranted under sections 271D and 271E read with section 274, setting aside JCIT&#039;s penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalties Waived For Cash Loans Under Section 269SS Due To Genuine Financial Crisis And Lender&#039;s Anonymity Concerns</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85429</link>
      <description>ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee&#039;s circumstances as middle-class, uneducated individual who received loans from agriculturists seeking anonymity due to CBI concerns. Reasonable cause was established given the timing of loans immediately after CBI actions and assessee&#039;s dire financial need. The subsequent cash repayment was made on lender&#039;s insistence. Given these mitigating factors and genuine circumstances, ITAT determined penalties were not warranted under sections 271D and 271E read with section 274, setting aside JCIT&#039;s penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>