<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Security Interest Priority Outweighs Vote Share in CoC Resolution Plan Approval Under Section 30(4)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85422</link>
    <description>NCLAT upheld CoC&#039;s discretion in approving resolution plan based on security interest rather than vote share of financial creditors. The tribunal confirmed that post-amendment Section 30(4) empowers CoC to consider security interest priority while approving distribution mechanism. The dissenting financial creditor&#039;s claim for distribution based on security interest was rejected as the approved plan satisfied Section 30(2)(b) requirements by offering above liquidation value. The CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in choosing distribution method was deemed final and binding on all creditors. The appeal challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was dismissed, affirming that CoC&#039;s decision aligned with statutory provisions and required no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Security Interest Priority Outweighs Vote Share in CoC Resolution Plan Approval Under Section 30(4)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85422</link>
      <description>NCLAT upheld CoC&#039;s discretion in approving resolution plan based on security interest rather than vote share of financial creditors. The tribunal confirmed that post-amendment Section 30(4) empowers CoC to consider security interest priority while approving distribution mechanism. The dissenting financial creditor&#039;s claim for distribution based on security interest was rejected as the approved plan satisfied Section 30(2)(b) requirements by offering above liquidation value. The CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in choosing distribution method was deemed final and binding on all creditors. The appeal challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was dismissed, affirming that CoC&#039;s decision aligned with statutory provisions and required no interference.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>