<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 90 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765544</link>
    <description>Calcutta HC held that reassessment proceedings against a dissolved company were invalid. The court found that income tax authorities violated statutory preconditions under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by failing to conduct preliminary inquiry under Section 148A(a) and acting solely on external reports without independent application of mind. The proceedings also violated Section 14 of the IBC which imposes moratorium during CIRP, and the NCLT-approved resolution plan under Section 238 IBC precluded reassessment for the relevant period. The writ petition was allowed and all impugned notices and orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 90 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765544</link>
      <description>Calcutta HC held that reassessment proceedings against a dissolved company were invalid. The court found that income tax authorities violated statutory preconditions under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by failing to conduct preliminary inquiry under Section 148A(a) and acting solely on external reports without independent application of mind. The proceedings also violated Section 14 of the IBC which imposes moratorium during CIRP, and the NCLT-approved resolution plan under Section 238 IBC precluded reassessment for the relevant period. The writ petition was allowed and all impugned notices and orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>