<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40942</link>
    <description>Copper coated mild steel wires and wire cuts were held not to fall within &quot;welding electrodes&quot; under Tariff Item 50 because classification in a fiscal entry depends on common and trade parlance, not technical meaning, dictionary definitions, or end-use unless the tariff itself makes use relevant. The revenue had to prove that the goods were commercially understood as welding electrodes, and that burden was not discharged. The classification orders were therefore unsustainable, and refund relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40942</link>
      <description>Copper coated mild steel wires and wire cuts were held not to fall within &quot;welding electrodes&quot; under Tariff Item 50 because classification in a fiscal entry depends on common and trade parlance, not technical meaning, dictionary definitions, or end-use unless the tariff itself makes use relevant. The revenue had to prove that the goods were commercially understood as welding electrodes, and that burden was not discharged. The classification orders were therefore unsustainable, and refund relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>