<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40925</link>
    <description>An X-ray film processing unit fitted with a cooling mechanism was held not to be a refrigerating appliance under Item 29A of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The entry was read as covering appliances whose basic object is refrigeration or cooling, such as ice makers, bottle coolers and water coolers. Here, the cooling arrangement was only incidental to improve film-processing results, while the unit&#039;s predominant character remained X-ray film processing. The trade understanding test was found unhelpful because the units were newly manufactured and supplied in-house, so classification turned on the plain meaning of the entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40925</link>
      <description>An X-ray film processing unit fitted with a cooling mechanism was held not to be a refrigerating appliance under Item 29A of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The entry was read as covering appliances whose basic object is refrigeration or cooling, such as ice makers, bottle coolers and water coolers. Here, the cooling arrangement was only incidental to improve film-processing results, while the unit&#039;s predominant character remained X-ray film processing. The trade understanding test was found unhelpful because the units were newly manufactured and supplied in-house, so classification turned on the plain meaning of the entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>