<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 96 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40924</link>
    <description>Revenue authorities cannot depart from a concluded excise assessment view without fresh facts, a change in law, or other cogent reasons. The earlier revisional order had finally determined that crimped yarn was assessable on the basis of resultant denierage, and the later trade notice and departmental communications were inconsistent with that binding determination. The court therefore quashed the impugned directions, held that duty could not be levied on the basis of the component denier of the single yarn in the absence of any material change, and directed refund relief to be worked out in accordance with the earlier revisional order, subject to verification if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 96 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40924</link>
      <description>Revenue authorities cannot depart from a concluded excise assessment view without fresh facts, a change in law, or other cogent reasons. The earlier revisional order had finally determined that crimped yarn was assessable on the basis of resultant denierage, and the later trade notice and departmental communications were inconsistent with that binding determination. The court therefore quashed the impugned directions, held that duty could not be levied on the basis of the component denier of the single yarn in the absence of any material change, and directed refund relief to be worked out in accordance with the earlier revisional order, subject to verification if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>