<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (10) TMI 1 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40915</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to charge excise duty based on the price at which the goods were sold to Usha, excluding post-manufacturing expenses and the value of regulators for the period prior to 19th June 1977. The court allowed the writ petition, determining the liability of the petitioner to excise duty in line with the judgment&#039;s principles and awarded costs to the petitioner, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (10) TMI 1 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40915</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to charge excise duty based on the price at which the goods were sold to Usha, excluding post-manufacturing expenses and the value of regulators for the period prior to 19th June 1977. The court allowed the writ petition, determining the liability of the petitioner to excise duty in line with the judgment&#039;s principles and awarded costs to the petitioner, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>