<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40912</link>
    <description>Imported thread rolling dies specially designed for Tsugami machines, made to precise specifications and usable only for those machines, were held to be component parts essential to the machinery&#039;s working. The court applied the principle that an article with no practical use apart from a particular machine remains classifiable under the main tariff entry for machinery components, and is not displaced into an exclusion clause merely because the entry illustratively refers to dies as small tools. On that basis, the dies fell within Item 72(3) and not Item 71(a), the customs classification was rejected, and refund relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 10:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40912</link>
      <description>Imported thread rolling dies specially designed for Tsugami machines, made to precise specifications and usable only for those machines, were held to be component parts essential to the machinery&#039;s working. The court applied the principle that an article with no practical use apart from a particular machine remains classifiable under the main tariff entry for machinery components, and is not displaced into an exclusion clause merely because the entry illustratively refers to dies as small tools. On that basis, the dies fell within Item 72(3) and not Item 71(a), the customs classification was rejected, and refund relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>