<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40910</link>
    <description>Import licences issued for niacinamide were treated as valid until cancelled under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, and the import control policy itself was not given statutory force. Licensing authorities were responsible for determining licensability before issue, while Customs could only check whether the goods matched the licence and its conditions; they could not reassess policy validity. Clause 10C applied only to validly imported goods and did not support directions based on an alleged ban. Public notices and executive instructions could not override existing licences or Clause 9 cancellation procedure, and any price fixation under Clause 10C had to include relevant charges and remain reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 17:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 121 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40910</link>
      <description>Import licences issued for niacinamide were treated as valid until cancelled under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, and the import control policy itself was not given statutory force. Licensing authorities were responsible for determining licensability before issue, while Customs could only check whether the goods matched the licence and its conditions; they could not reassess policy validity. Clause 10C applied only to validly imported goods and did not support directions based on an alleged ban. Public notices and executive instructions could not override existing licences or Clause 9 cancellation procedure, and any price fixation under Clause 10C had to include relevant charges and remain reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>