<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40887</link>
    <description>The court held that the flour grinding mills manufactured by the petitioner were not classified under Tariff Item No. 33-C of the Central Excises and Salt Act. The court invalidated the order for excise duty, issuing a writ of mandamus to cease recovery of excise duty on the mills. The judgment clarified that an electric element or motor must be present for an appliance to be considered a domestic electrical appliance subject to excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 15:41:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40887</link>
      <description>The court held that the flour grinding mills manufactured by the petitioner were not classified under Tariff Item No. 33-C of the Central Excises and Salt Act. The court invalidated the order for excise duty, issuing a writ of mandamus to cease recovery of excise duty on the mills. The judgment clarified that an electric element or motor must be present for an appliance to be considered a domestic electrical appliance subject to excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>