<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765475</link>
    <description>The Madras HC dismissed a petition challenging the execution of an exit formula devised by the Company Law Board for foreign investors to exit a joint venture with an Indian company. The court held that the CLB&#039;s directions constituted reduction of share capital, not a buy-back of shares, requiring payment of invested amounts to the foreign investors. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to manipulate the exit formula interpretation was rejected. The court affirmed the legality of property sale to the foreign investor&#039;s nominee under FEMA regulations with proper RBI permissions. The petition was found to lack merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 08:41:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765475</link>
      <description>The Madras HC dismissed a petition challenging the execution of an exit formula devised by the Company Law Board for foreign investors to exit a joint venture with an Indian company. The court held that the CLB&#039;s directions constituted reduction of share capital, not a buy-back of shares, requiring payment of invested amounts to the foreign investors. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to manipulate the exit formula interpretation was rejected. The court affirmed the legality of property sale to the foreign investor&#039;s nominee under FEMA regulations with proper RBI permissions. The petition was found to lack merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>