<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 61 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765515</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC considered whether the constitutional validity of section 16(2)(c) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, stated to be identical to the corresponding Central GST provision, required examination at the stage of issuing rule and interim relief. The court issued rule returnable and granted ad-interim protection against coercive steps during pendency of the petition, directing that the petition be heard with a connected matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 61 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765515</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC considered whether the constitutional validity of section 16(2)(c) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, stated to be identical to the corresponding Central GST provision, required examination at the stage of issuing rule and interim relief. The court issued rule returnable and granted ad-interim protection against coercive steps during pendency of the petition, directing that the petition be heard with a connected matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>