<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 64 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765518</link>
    <description>The HC held that the petitioner was entitled to a refund of differential tax amount under GST regime for a works contract. The court directed the opposite party to ensure disbursement of the refund within six weeks from the date of the order. The opposite party was granted liberty to produce a certified copy of the order to the concerned authority for processing the refund. The petition was disposed of with the court ruling in favor of the petitioner&#039;s claim for tax refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=794101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 64 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765518</link>
      <description>The HC held that the petitioner was entitled to a refund of differential tax amount under GST regime for a works contract. The court directed the opposite party to ensure disbursement of the refund within six weeks from the date of the order. The opposite party was granted liberty to produce a certified copy of the order to the concerned authority for processing the refund. The petition was disposed of with the court ruling in favor of the petitioner&#039;s claim for tax refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>