https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765520 In GST proceedings, the pre-deposit required to file an appeal and continue stay of the first appellate order was treated as corresponding to the reduced 10% rate. The petitioner relied on the later notification and the matching State notification, and the Court accepted that the deposit requirement for continuation of stay should align with the revised threshold. The practical effect was that 10% of the disputed tax became sufficient to keep the impugned first appellate order stayed, and the writ petition was disposed of. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765520 In GST proceedings, the pre-deposit required to file an appeal and continue stay of the first appellate order was treated as corresponding to the reduced 10% rate. The petitioner relied on the later notification and the matching State notification, and the Court accepted that the deposit requirement for continuation of stay should align with the revised threshold. The practical effect was that 10% of the disputed tax became sufficient to keep the impugned first appellate order stayed, and the writ petition was disposed of. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765520