<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40871</link>
    <description>Excise valuation must be based on the normal wholesale cash price at the factory gate, because duty is levied on manufacture and section 4 requires assessment at the time and place of removal. The intermediary buyer&#039;s downstream resale price cannot replace the manufacturer&#039;s price unless there is evidence that the factory-gate price is specially low or that the buyer is a favoured customer in a non-arm&#039;s-length arrangement. On the facts, the goods were specialised components with a limited market and the intermediary was the natural wholesale outlet, so the factory-gate price remained the proper assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40871</link>
      <description>Excise valuation must be based on the normal wholesale cash price at the factory gate, because duty is levied on manufacture and section 4 requires assessment at the time and place of removal. The intermediary buyer&#039;s downstream resale price cannot replace the manufacturer&#039;s price unless there is evidence that the factory-gate price is specially low or that the buyer is a favoured customer in a non-arm&#039;s-length arrangement. On the facts, the goods were specialised components with a limited market and the intermediary was the natural wholesale outlet, so the factory-gate price remained the proper assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>