<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40869</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition, ordering the respondents to return the seized goods to the petitioner within 15 days due to the lack of opportunity to be heard before passing the impugned orders. However, the challenge to the notice under section 124 based on timing was dismissed, allowing the adjudication proceedings to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40869</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition, ordering the respondents to return the seized goods to the petitioner within 15 days due to the lack of opportunity to be heard before passing the impugned orders. However, the challenge to the notice under section 124 based on timing was dismissed, allowing the adjudication proceedings to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>