<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40861</link>
    <description>For assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, only the actual duty payable at removal can be deducted from the wholesale cash price. Where an exemption under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 reduced duty through a rebate linked to cotton seed oil content, the rebate had to be reflected in the duty deduction itself. The rebate was not to be ignored or treated as a separate post-computation benefit. On that basis, the assessable value had to be calculated by deducting the reduced duty rather than the unreduced ad valorem duty, and the Revenue&#039;s computation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40861</link>
      <description>For assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, only the actual duty payable at removal can be deducted from the wholesale cash price. Where an exemption under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 reduced duty through a rebate linked to cotton seed oil content, the rebate had to be reflected in the duty deduction itself. The rebate was not to be ignored or treated as a separate post-computation benefit. On that basis, the assessable value had to be calculated by deducting the reduced duty rather than the unreduced ad valorem duty, and the Revenue&#039;s computation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>