<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 56 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (REVISION CASE)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40856</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes were construed as falling within Entry 50 of the Central Excise Tariff even without flux coating, because the entry covered electrodes of all kinds and did not make flux coating an essential condition. The absence of that process feature therefore did not take the goods outside the tariff entry, and the classification objection was rejected. The departmental view on tariff classification was sustained, as an additional manufacturing feature not required by the entry could not narrow its scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:11:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 56 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (REVISION CASE)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40856</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes were construed as falling within Entry 50 of the Central Excise Tariff even without flux coating, because the entry covered electrodes of all kinds and did not make flux coating an essential condition. The absence of that process feature therefore did not take the goods outside the tariff entry, and the classification objection was rejected. The departmental view on tariff classification was sustained, as an additional manufacturing feature not required by the entry could not narrow its scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>