<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 101 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40849</link>
    <description>Central excise duty under Item 18E was stated to be chargeable on the yarn in the form in which it was cleared for further use, namely the unsized yarn taken from the spinning department to the weaving department, because there was no material showing clearance after sizing. The duty was therefore to be levied on the unsized weight of the yarn, not on a later processed sized form that was not the subject of clearance. The revision was allowed on merits, and the limitation issue and Rule 10A were not examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 12:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 101 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40849</link>
      <description>Central excise duty under Item 18E was stated to be chargeable on the yarn in the form in which it was cleared for further use, namely the unsized yarn taken from the spinning department to the weaving department, because there was no material showing clearance after sizing. The duty was therefore to be levied on the unsized weight of the yarn, not on a later processed sized form that was not the subject of clearance. The revision was allowed on merits, and the limitation issue and Rule 10A were not examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>