https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765368 The Delhi High Court declined to quash the FIR and chargesheet on the ground of delay, holding that Article 21 speedy-trial concerns do not justify interference where the allegations are serious and the trial has substantially progressed. The Court noted charges had been framed and prosecution evidence had begun, and found that the delay relied on was not of the kind that made the proceedings constitutionally unfair. The criminal case was therefore allowed to continue, with a direction for expeditious completion of the trial. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:54:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765368 The Delhi High Court declined to quash the FIR and chargesheet on the ground of delay, holding that Article 21 speedy-trial concerns do not justify interference where the allegations are serious and the trial has substantially progressed. The Court noted charges had been framed and prosecution evidence had begun, and found that the delay relied on was not of the kind that made the proceedings constitutionally unfair. The criminal case was therefore allowed to continue, with a direction for expeditious completion of the trial. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765368