<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1453 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765388</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging distribution of liquidation proceeds. Appellant sought distribution based on security interest rather than pro-rata basis per admitted claims under Section 53(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority correctly directed distribution on pro-rata basis of admitted claims among financial creditors. Tribunal relied on precedent and rejected appellant&#039;s reliance on undertaking given by stakeholders, ruling it cannot override statutory distribution mechanism. No error found in lower authority&#039;s order directing proportionate distribution rather than security-based distribution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:54:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1453 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765388</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging distribution of liquidation proceeds. Appellant sought distribution based on security interest rather than pro-rata basis per admitted claims under Section 53(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority correctly directed distribution on pro-rata basis of admitted claims among financial creditors. Tribunal relied on precedent and rejected appellant&#039;s reliance on undertaking given by stakeholders, ruling it cannot override statutory distribution mechanism. No error found in lower authority&#039;s order directing proportionate distribution rather than security-based distribution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>