<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40833</link>
    <description>For excise valuation under section 4 before the 1-10-1975 amendment, assessable value is to be based on the wholesale cash price after excluding post-manufacturing selling and marketing expenses. Excise is a duty on manufacture, so commercial costs incurred after manufacture do not form part of the assessable value. Where the sale price through a marketing division embeds such expenses and profit, that price is not, by itself, the governing valuation base; those elements may be spread over turnover on an equalised basis where required. On that approach, the assessee was entitled to the deductions and the demand and orders refusing them could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:57:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40833</link>
      <description>For excise valuation under section 4 before the 1-10-1975 amendment, assessable value is to be based on the wholesale cash price after excluding post-manufacturing selling and marketing expenses. Excise is a duty on manufacture, so commercial costs incurred after manufacture do not form part of the assessable value. Where the sale price through a marketing division embeds such expenses and profit, that price is not, by itself, the governing valuation base; those elements may be spread over turnover on an equalised basis where required. On that approach, the assessee was entitled to the deductions and the demand and orders refusing them could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>