<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1504 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765439</link>
    <description>HC held that reassessment notices issued to a non-existent entity after a merger are void for substantive illegality, not merely procedural defects. The court found a fundamental error in issuing notices despite knowledge of the merger, concluding such notices cannot be sustained and cannot be treated as valid. Relying on precedent from the SC that notices to non-existent companies are impermissible, the HC allowed the challenge and decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1504 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765439</link>
      <description>HC held that reassessment notices issued to a non-existent entity after a merger are void for substantive illegality, not merely procedural defects. The court found a fundamental error in issuing notices despite knowledge of the merger, concluding such notices cannot be sustained and cannot be treated as valid. Relying on precedent from the SC that notices to non-existent companies are impermissible, the HC allowed the challenge and decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>