<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 114 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40829</link>
    <description>Refund claims based on advance deposits of excise duty are outside the limitation regime in Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which was treated as confined to refunds of duty paid by inadvertence, error, or misconstruction. For advance-deposit cases, the general law of limitation applies instead, and the revision was allowed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 114 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40829</link>
      <description>Refund claims based on advance deposits of excise duty are outside the limitation regime in Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which was treated as confined to refunds of duty paid by inadvertence, error, or misconstruction. For advance-deposit cases, the general law of limitation applies instead, and the revision was allowed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>