<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1519 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765454</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the SLP challenging the HC&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim for refund of Input Tax Credit accrued under the VAT regime during the transition to GST. The court upheld that the petitioner is not entitled to a refund under Section 143(8)(b) and can only utilize the ITC as set-off against output tax. The HC&#039;s decision to deny the refund claim was affirmed, with no interference warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1519 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765454</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the SLP challenging the HC&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim for refund of Input Tax Credit accrued under the VAT regime during the transition to GST. The court upheld that the petitioner is not entitled to a refund under Section 143(8)(b) and can only utilize the ITC as set-off against output tax. The HC&#039;s decision to deny the refund claim was affirmed, with no interference warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>