<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HIGHLIGHTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32031</link>
    <description>Supreme Court reviewed high court directions requiring state officials to take possession of disputed churches and noted concern about orders authorising use of force in religious places. The Court authorised high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges as a limited mechanism to manage criminal case backlogs. A trial court dismissed revision pleas challenging cognisance orders in an alleged assault matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 21:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 21:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HIGHLIGHTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32031</link>
      <description>Supreme Court reviewed high court directions requiring state officials to take possession of disputed churches and noted concern about orders authorising use of force in religious places. The Court authorised high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges as a limited mechanism to manage criminal case backlogs. A trial court dismissed revision pleas challenging cognisance orders in an alleged assault matter.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 21:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=32031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>