<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 33 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40824</link>
    <description>The Government classified printed cartons as products of the packaging industry, denying exemption from central excise duty. Despite printing being integral, additional processes like cutting and creasing were deemed crucial in carton production. Emphasizing packaging functions and the company&#039;s industrial license for paper packaging, the Government upheld the original decision, rejecting the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 33 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40824</link>
      <description>The Government classified printed cartons as products of the packaging industry, denying exemption from central excise duty. Despite printing being integral, additional processes like cutting and creasing were deemed crucial in carton production. Emphasizing packaging functions and the company&#039;s industrial license for paper packaging, the Government upheld the original decision, rejecting the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>